UK Takes a Unique Approach to AI Regulation
The UK is charting its own course when it comes to regulating artificial intelligence, diverging from the approaches taken by its Western peers. According to Feryal Clark, Britain’s minister for AI and digital government, the country wants to “do its own thing” when it comes to regulation, emphasizing the importance of baking safety into AI models from the outset.
A Different Path
Unlike the EU, which has introduced comprehensive legislation to harmonize AI rules across the bloc, the UK has refrained from introducing formal laws to regulate AI. Instead, it has deferred to individual regulatory bodies to enforce existing rules on businesses. This approach is distinct from the US, which lacks federal-level AI regulation and has adopted a patchwork of regulatory frameworks at the state and local level.
Industry Collaboration
The UK government has established a “good relationship” with AI companies like OpenAI and Google DeepMind, which have voluntarily opened their models up to the government for safety testing purposes. Clark emphasized the importance of working with the sector to develop safety measures and ensure that AI is developed and used responsibly.
Post-Brexit Freedom
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has highlighted the UK’s newfound freedom to regulate AI in a way that suits its best interests, following Brexit. The UK has the ability to choose its own approach, rather than being bound by EU regulations.
Frontier AI Models
During Starmer’s election campaign, the Labour Party committed to introducing regulation focusing on “frontier” AI models, such as large language models like OpenAI’s GPT. However, details on proposed AI safety legislation are still pending, with the government promising to consult with the industry before proposing formal rules.
Industry Uncertainty
Some experts, such as Chris Mooney of Marriott Harrison, have expressed concerns about the UK’s “wait and see” approach to AI regulation, which may be causing uncertainty for businesses. Others, like Sachin Dev Duggal of Builder.ai, have warned that proceeding without clear rules is “borderline reckless” and could lead to missed opportunities for the UK to establish itself as a leader in AI.
Copyright Reform
One area where the UK government has spoken up on reforming rules for AI is around copyright. The country has opened a consultation reviewing its copyright framework to assess possible exceptions to existing rules for AI developers using artists and media publishers’ works to train their models.
A Third Way
Some figures in the UK tech scene believe that a more relaxed, flexible approach to regulating AI may be the right one. Russ Shaw of Tech London Advocates suggests that the UK is well-positioned to adopt a “third way” on AI safety and regulation, with sector-specific regulations tailored to different industries like financial services and healthcare.
Clarity Needed
Despite the UK’s ambitions to become a global leader in AI, some experts argue that clarity is needed on the country’s approach to regulation. John Buyers of Osborne Clarke has called for the government to provide a holistic view of where its AI economy is heading, warning that failure to disclose details of new AI safety laws could lead to investor uncertainty.
Leave a Reply